The Nvidia GeForce MX110 is an entry-level graphics card for laptops that was launched at the end of 2017. It is a renamed Geforce 920MX and based on the Maxwell GM108 chip with a reduced shader count of 256. According to our sources the TDP of 5-12 Watt and the support for DDR3 and GDDR5 is also specified.
The performance is on par with the GeForce 920MX and depends on the used graphics memory. Therefore, demanding games from 2015 may not run at all fluently or only in lowest settings. Less demanding games, like The Sims 4, should be playable in medium to high settings.
GeForce MX100 Series |
|
| Codename | N16V-GMR1 |
| Architecture | Maxwell |
| Pipelines | 256 – unified |
| Core Speed | 965 – 993 (Boost) MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1800 MHz |
| Memory Bus Width | 64 Bit |
| Memory Type | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared Memory | no |
| API | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 |
| technology | 28 nm |
| Features | Optimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play, GameWorks |
| Date of Announcement | 01.01.2018 |
| Link to Manufacturer Page | https://www.geforce.com/hardware/noteboo… |
Benchmarks
Performance Rating – 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 500 avg: 515 median: 515 (2%) max: 530 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 437 avg: 450.5 median: 450.5 (1%) max: 464 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 122046 avg: 124037 median: 124036 (14%) max: 126027 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 9593 avg: 9825 median: 9867 (11%) max: 10015 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 10858 avg: 11146 median: 11266 (4%) max: 11314 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1600 avg: 1629 median: 1641 (3%) max: 1647 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1666 avg: 1701 median: 1714 (2%) max: 1722 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2367 avg: 2382 median: 2378 (3%) max: 2400 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2115 avg: 2125 median: 2121 (2%) max: 2140 Points
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s153’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. total
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s154’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3DMark 03 – 3DMark 03 – Standard
3DMark 05 – 3DMark 05 – Standard
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb4_s16’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark 06 3DMark 06 – Standard 1280×1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 – Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
Unigine Heaven 3.0 – Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
Unigine Heaven 3.0 – Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
Unigine Heaven 2.1 – Heaven 2.1 high
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb22_s38’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 – Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s707’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 55 avg: 57.2 median: 57.8 (15%) max: 58.8 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s708’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb216_s641’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 – GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb216_s640’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 – GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
GFXBench 3.0 – GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
GFXBench 3.0 – GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
ComputeMark v2.1 – ComputeMark v2.1 Result
Power Consumption – Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption – external Monitor *
Power Consumption – The Witcher 3 Power Consumption – external Monitor *
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Speed Furmark
– Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
– Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920×1080
low 1366×768
med. 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×768
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1366×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920×1080
Lowest Settings possible 1920×1080
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024×768
med. 1360×768
high 1360×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 10. 17:45:13
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by “_”) +0s … 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:10:53 +0100 +0.001s … 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.03s … 0.031s
#4 did output specs +0s … 0.031s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.031s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8130 +0.021s … 0.052s
#7 got single benchmarks 8130 +0.02s … 0.073s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.073s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.474s … 0.547s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.547s
#11 Got 254 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s … 0.559s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.559s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.042s … 0.601s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.169s … 1.77s
#15 return log +0.061s … 1.831s
Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX110 graphics card
HP 250 G7 in review: Scrap recycling done the HP way
The HP 250 G7 offers a current Ice Lake processor, a GeForce graphics core, 8 GB of RAM, and an NVMe SSD for just under 500 Euros (~$596). The built-in display …
Intel Core i5-1035G1 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | 15.60″ | 1.8 kg
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (8250U, MX110) Laptop Review
Xiaomi has now built up a proud selection of notebooks alongside its Mi smartphones. Our focus for this review is the Mi Notebook 15.6, which lacks the Pro, Air…
Intel Core i5-8250U | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | 15.60″ | 2.2 kg
HP 15 (i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review
Display disappointment. Hewlett Packard’s 15.6-inch notebook features a Core i5 CPU, a fast NVMe SSD, and a dedicated GeForce MX 110 GPU with GDDR5 video RAM. U…
Intel Core i5-8250U | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | 15.60″ | 1.8 kg
Samsung Book X45: Intel Core i5-10210U, 15.60″, 2 kg
External Review » Samsung Book X45
Asus F409JB-EK013T: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Asus F409JB-EK013T
Lenovo V15-IWL-81YE008DUK: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60″, 2.1 kg
External Review » Lenovo V15-IWL-81YE008DUK
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IWL-81LG00N0RU: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IWL-81LG00N0RU
HP 15-da1031tx: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » HP 15-da1031tx
Lenovo Ideapad S145-15IWL-81MV00B3GE: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S145-15IWL-81MV00B3GE
Asus X540UB-GQ491T: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Asus X540UB-GQ491T
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D): Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60″, 2.2 kg
External Review » Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
Asus K540UB-GQ066T: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60″, 2.2 kg
External Review » Asus K540UB-GQ066T
HP 15-da1014ns: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » HP 15-da1014ns
HP 15-da0058ns: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » HP 15-da0058ns
Asus X540UB-DM024T: Intel Core i3-6006U, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
External Review » Asus X540UB-DM024T
HP 250 G7-15S40ES: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
» No recommendation for the HP 250 G7, wrong display choice
